Back Original

Fara-7B: An efficient agentic model for computer use


Fara-7B is Microsoft's first agentic small language model (SLM) designed specifically for computer use. With only 7 billion parameters, Fara-7B is an ultra-compact Computer Use Agent (CUA) that achieves state-of-the-art performance within its size class and is competitive with larger, more resource-intensive agentic systems.

Try Fara-7B locally as follows (see Installation for detailed instructions):

# 1. Clone repository
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/fara.git
cd fara

# 2. Setup environment
python3 -m venv .venv 
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e .
playwright install

Then in one process, host the model:

vllm serve "microsoft/Fara-7B" --port 5000 --dtype auto 

Then you can iterative query it with:

fara-cli --task "whats the weather in new york now"

Hint: might need to do --tensor-parallel-size 2 with vllm command if you run out of memory

What Makes Fara-7B Unique

Unlike traditional chat models that generate text-based responses, Fara-7B leverages computer interfaces—mouse and keyboard—to perform multi-step tasks on behalf of users. The model:

  • Operates visually by perceiving webpages and taking actions like scrolling, typing, and clicking on directly predicted coordinates
  • Uses the same modalities as humans to interact with computers—no accessibility trees or separate parsing models required
  • Enables on-device deployment due to its compact 7B parameter size, resulting in reduced latency and improved privacy as user data remains local
  • Completes tasks efficiently, averaging only ~16 steps per task compared to ~41 for comparable models

Fara-7B is trained using a novel synthetic data generation pipeline built on the Magentic-One multi-agent framework, with 145K trajectories covering diverse websites, task types, and difficulty levels. The model is based on Qwen2.5-VL-7B and trained with supervised fine-tuning.

Fara-7B can automate everyday web tasks including:

  • Searching for information and summarizing results
  • Filling out forms and managing accounts
  • Booking travel, movie tickets, and restaurant reservations
  • Shopping and comparing prices across retailers
  • Finding job postings and real estate listings

Fara-7B achieves state-of-the-art results across multiple web agent benchmarks, outperforming both comparable-sized models and larger systems:

Model Params WebVoyager Online-M2W DeepShop WebTailBench
SoM Agents
SoM Agent (GPT-4o-0513) - 90.6 57.7 49.1 60.4
SoM Agent (o3-mini) - 79.3 55.4 49.7 52.7
SoM Agent (GPT-4o) - 65.1 34.6 16.0 30.8
GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 9B 66.8 33.9 32.0 22.4
Computer Use Models
OpenAI computer-use-preview - 70.9 42.9 24.7 25.7
UI-TARS-1.5-7B 7B 66.4 31.3 11.6 19.5
Fara-7B 7B 73.5 34.1 26.2 38.4

Table: Online agent evaluation results showing success rates (%) across four web benchmarks. Results are averaged over 3 runs.

WebTailBench: A New Benchmark for Real-World Web Tasks

We are releasing WebTailBench, a new evaluation benchmark focusing on 11 real-world task types that are underrepresented or missing in existing benchmarks. The benchmark includes 609 tasks across diverse categories, with the first 8 segments testing single skills or objectives (usually on a single website), and the remaining 3 evaluating more difficult multi-step or cross-site tasks.

WebTailBench Detailed Results

Task Segment Tasks SoM GPT-4o-0513 SoM o3-mini SoM GPT-4o GLM-4.1V-9B OAI Comp-Use UI-TARS-1.5 Fara-7B
Single-Site Tasks
Shopping 56 62.5 71.4 38.1 31.0 42.3 41.1 52.4
Flights 51 60.1 39.2 11.1 10.5 17.6 10.5 37.9
Hotels 52 68.6 56.4 31.4 19.9 26.9 35.3 53.8
Restaurants 52 67.9 59.6 47.4 32.1 35.9 22.4 47.4
Activities 80 70.4 62.9 41.7 26.3 30.4 9.6 36.3
Ticketing 57 58.5 56.7 37.4 35.7 49.7 30.4 38.6
Real Estate 48 34.0 17.4 20.1 16.0 9.0 9.7 23.6
Jobs/Careers 50 49.3 44.0 32.7 22.7 20.7 20.7 28.0
Multi-Step Tasks
Shopping List (2 items) 51 66.0 62.7 17.0 7.8 34.0 20.9 49.0
Comparison Shopping 57 67.3 59.1 27.5 22.8 1.2 8.8 32.7
Compositional Tasks 55 51.5 39.4 26.7 17.0 10.3 9.1 23.0
Overall
Macro Average 609 59.7 51.7 30.1 22.0 25.3 19.9 38.4
Micro Average 609 60.4 52.7 30.8 22.4 25.7 19.5 38.4

Table: Breakdown of WebTailBench results across all 11 segments. Success rates (%) are averaged over 3 independent runs. Fara-7B achieves the highest performance among computer-use models across all task categories.

Coming Soon:

  • Task Verification pipeline for LLM-as-a-judge evaluation
  • Official human annotations of WebTailBench (in partnership with BrowserBase)

Evaluation Infrastructure

Our evaluation setup leverages:

  1. Playwright - A cross-browser automation framework that replicates browser environments
  2. Abstract Web Agent Interface - Allows integration of any model from any source into the evaluation environment
  3. Fara-Agent Class - Reference implementation for running the Fara model

Note: Fara-7B is an experimental release designed to invite hands-on exploration and feedback from the community. We recommend running it in a sandboxed environment, monitoring its execution, and avoiding sensitive data or high-risk domains.


Install the package using either UV or pip:

or

Then install Playwright browsers:


Recommended: The easiest way to get started is using Azure Foundry hosting, which requires no GPU hardware or model downloads. Alternatively, you can self-host with VLLM if you have GPU resources available.

Azure Foundry Hosting (Recommended)

Deploy Fara-7B on Azure Foundry without needing to download weights or manage GPU infrastructure.

Setup:

  1. Deploy the Fara-7B model on Azure Foundry and obtain your endpoint URL and API key
  2. Add your endpoint details to the existing endpoint_configs/ directory (example configs are already provided):
# Edit one of the existing config files or create a new one
# endpoint_configs/fara-7b-hosting-ansrz.json (example format):
{
    "model": "Fara-7B",
    "base_url": "https://your-endpoint.inference.ml.azure.com/",
    "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
}
  1. Run the Fara agent:
fara-cli --task "how many pages does wikipedia have" --start_page "https://www.bing.com"

That's it! No GPU or model downloads required.

If you have access to GPU resources, you can self-host Fara-7B using VLLM. This requires a GPU machine with sufficient VRAM.

All that is required is to run the following command to start the VLLM server:

vllm serve "microsoft/Fara-7B" --port 5000 --dtype auto 

Run the test script to see Fara in action:

fara-cli --task "how many pages does wikipedia have" --start_page "https://www.bing.com" --endpoint_config endpoint_configs/azure_foundry_config.json [--headful] [--downloads_folder "/path/to/downloads"] [--save_screenshots] [--max_rounds 100] [--browserbase]

In self-hosting scenario the endpoint_config points to endpoint_configs/vllm_config.json from the VLLM server above.

If you set --browserbase, export environment variables for the API key and project ID.

Initializing Browser...
Browser Running... Starting Fara Agent...
##########################################
Task: how many pages does wikipedia have
##########################################
Running Fara...


Thought #1: To find the current number of Wikipedia pages, I'll search for the latest Wikipedia page count statistics.
Action #1: executing tool 'web_search' with arguments {"action": "web_search", "query": "Wikipedia total number of articles"}
Observation#1: I typed 'Wikipedia total number of articles' into the browser search bar.

Thought #2: Wikipedia currently has 7,095,446 articles.
Action #2: executing tool 'terminate' with arguments {"action": "terminate", "status": "success"}
Observation#2: Wikipedia currently has 7,095,446 articles.

Final Answer: Wikipedia currently has 7,095,446 articles.

Enter another task (or press Enter to exit): 

We provide a framework in webeval/ to reproduce our results on WebVoyager and OnlineMind2Web. Agentic evaluations on live websites present unique challenges due to day-to-day changes. We implement several measures to ensure reliable and comparable evaluations:

BrowserBase Integration We employ BrowserBase to manage browser session hosting, enabling reliable browser instance management.

Time-sensitive Task Updates Tasks in benchmarks like WebVoyager can become stale or impossible. We:

  • Removed ~48 impossible tasks from the original WebVoyager benchmark
  • Updated ~50 tasks with future dates to keep them achievable
  • Example: "Search for a hotel in Bali from Jan 1 to Jan 4, 2024""Search for a hotel in Bali from Jan 1 to Jan 4, 2026"
  • Our updated WebVoyager benchmark is available at webeval/data/webvoyager/WebVoyager_data_08312025.jsonl

Environment Error Handling Browser errors (connection drops, page timeouts) are handled robustly:

  • Trajectories are retried up to 5 times when environment errors occur
  • Complete yet incorrect trajectories are never retried
  • Each retry starts with a fresh browser session, with no retained state

Step Budget Each trajectory is capped at a maximum of 100 actions across all online benchmarks. Trajectories exceeding this budget without choosing to stop are considered incorrect.

WebEval Package Installation

conda create --name fara_webeval python=3.12
conda activate fara_webeval

# Install fara package
pip install -e .

# Install autogen submodule
git submodule update --init --recursive
cd autogen/python/packages
pip install -e autogen-core
pip install -e autogen-ext

# Install webeval
cd webeval
pip install -e .

# Install playwright
playwright install

Navigate to the scripts directory:

Make sure you set a valid OpenAI GPT-4o endpoint in endpoint_configs_gpt4o/dev in order to run the WebVoyager LLM-as-a-judge!

Option 1: Self-hosted VLLM

python webvoyager.py --model_url /path/where/you/want/to/download/model/ --model_port 5000 --eval_oai_config ../endpoint_configs_gpt4o/dev/ --out_url /path/to/save/eval/files --device_id 0,1 --processes 1 --run_id 1 --max_rounds 100

Option 2: Azure Foundry Deployment

Deploy Fara-7B on Foundry endpoint(s), then place endpoint URLs and keys in JSONs under endpoint_configs/:

python webvoyager.py --model_endpoint ../../endpoint_configs/ --eval_oai_config ../endpoint_configs_gpt4o/dev/ --out_url /path/to/save/eval/files --processes 1 --run_id 1_endpoint --max_rounds 100
  • We use the same LLM-as-a-judge prompts and model (GPT-4o) as WebVoyager, hence the --eval_oai_config argument
  • Set --browserbase for browser session management (requires exported API key and project ID environment variables)
  • Avoid overloading a single VLLM deployment with more than ~10 concurrent processes due to known issues
  • See debugging output in fara/webeval/scripts/stdout.txt

Analyzing Evaluation Results

Evaluation Output Structure

Evaluation results are stored under --out_url in folders organized by:

  • Model name
  • Dataset
  • Username
  • Run ID

Example path:

/runs/WebSurfer-fara-100-max_n_images-3/fara-7b/<username>/WebVoyager_WebVoyager_data_08312025.jsonl/<run_id>

Each evaluation folder contains:

  • gpt_eval/ - LLM-as-a-judge evaluation results
  • traj/ - Per-task trajectory subdirectories containing:
    • final_answer.json (e.g., Amazon--1_final_answer.json) - <no_answer> indicates abortion or step budget exceeded
    • scores/gpt_eval.json - LLM judge scores
    • web_surfer.log - Action history and errors
    • screenshot_X.png - Screenshots captured before each action X

Use the analysis notebook to compute metrics:

cd webeval/scripts/analyze_eval_results/
jupyter notebook analyze.ipynb

The script:

  • Identifies trajectories aborted mid-execution and diagnostic reasons
  • Computes average scores across non-aborted trajectories
  • Distinguishes between aborted trajectories (errors during sampling) and completed trajectories (with terminate() call or step budget exceeded)

To re-run failed tasks, execute the evaluation script again with the same run_id and username - it will skip non-aborted tasks.

Example WebVoyager GPT Eval Result
{
  "score": 1.0,
  "gpt_response_text": "To evaluate the task, we need to verify if the criteria have been met:\n\n1. **Recipe Requirement**: A vegetarian lasagna recipe with zucchini and at least a four-star rating.\n\n2. **Search and Results**:\n   - The screenshots show that the search term used was \"vegetarian lasagna zucchini.\"\n   - Among the search results, \"Debbie's Vegetable Lasagna\" is prominently featured.\n   \n3. **Evaluation of the Recipe**:\n   - Rating: \"Debbie's Vegetable Lasagna\" has a rating of 4.7, which satisfies the requirement of being at least four stars.\n   - The presence of zucchini in the recipe is implied through the search conducted, though the screenshots do not explicitly show the ingredients list. However, the result response confirms the match to the criteria.\n\nGiven the information provided, the task seems to have fulfilled the requirement of finding a vegetarian lasagna recipe with zucchini and a four-star rating or higher. \n\n**Verdict: SUCCESS**"
}

If you use Fara in your research, please cite our work: